dcsimg
A Flash Developer Resource Site

Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: SOTD selection criteria

  1. #1
    Civilian
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    In the clouds
    Posts
    3,210
    For the SOTD comments crowd. Which of the "What's new" sites would you say deserves Site of the Day?



    http://www.flashkit.com/links/New/
    [Edited by jstarkey on 04-15-2002 at 04:06 AM]

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Posts
    20

    Which of the "What's new" sites would you say deserves SotD?

    Which of the "What's new" sites would you say deserves Site of the Day?

    In my opinion I would most like to see new Flash design by non-commercial, non-mainstream designers. I would accept ground-breaking design from a commercial site as long as it was truly something new and not something re-hashed from old ideas.

    My aversion to commercial sites is that they have the money to throw at big projects and are seldom original or inspirational.

    Like the W.W.W. evolved from the masses so has good Flash design, to see it rehashed by the commercial sites makes SOTD looks like a cheap advertisment platform for them.

    new, original, inovative, inspirational, non-profit, non-commercial should be the main criteria for SOTD.

    BeckySG1 (Keep it Real!)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    854

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Posts
    118
    http://www.studiocmd.com

    the corporate one done in flash

    http://www.studiocmd.com

    the corporate one, done in hTML

    http://www.studiocmd.com

    the kick ass dhtml and flash one

    http://www.studiocmd.com

    the experimental dissection and manufactured one

    that'S 4 big sites from 1 guy (i think) and you'd be craxy not to give studiocmd the SOTD

    http://www.studiocmd.com IS SICK WIKKID AWSOME!

  5. #5
    Civilian
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    In the clouds
    Posts
    3,210
    white-pony, we're referring only to submitted links. I have to give them first consideration.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    854
    seems that white-pony must have a connection with studiocmd...every post seems to mention that site

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Posts
    118
    jstarkey, it is in here : http://www.flashkit.com/links/New/2002-03-12.shtml I found that before, I'm not anything with these guys, I'm still trying to figur out frontpage - eekk, but I'm a huge fan and why is that so odd rooney?

    Lot's of people around here praise 2advancd or juxtionterative, and I prauise studiocmd, I think they should be site of the day, they rock!

  8. #8
    Civilian
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    In the clouds
    Posts
    3,210
    kool. Thanks, I'll post this soon.

  9. #9
    general rule bender Gloomycus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    ontario canada
    Posts
    1,538
    http://inko.cjb.net

    my work, great comments - everyone loves it, submitted it last week so its still fresh
    [Edited by Gloomycus on 04-15-2002 at 06:13 PM]

  10. #10
    general rule bender Gloomycus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    ontario canada
    Posts
    1,538
    i mean my site was submitted just last week, shouldn't it have precendence over studio?

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    121
    Thanks to Flashkit and jstarkey for placing studio:cmd [activemedia] v02.2 as site of the day.

    It is a great honour, and has brought a lot of traffic my way.

    Glommycus, I am noticing sour grapes from yourself, and granted, inko.cjb.net is a fine site - you have worked hard, it shows, and yes, I concur that it deserves a site of the day placement.

    After all, Flashkit is about community and member support, therefore it should only go with the FK direction that its own members are chosen when their work reaches a level of standard expertise and professionalism.

    studio:cmd [activemedia] v02.2 was noticed and linked by FK some time ago Gloomycus, and therefore I would believe that this is the reason it was placed... That and white-pony promoting it (albeit un-nervingly) everywhere he goes.

    jstarkey, I think you should take a good look at inko.cjb.net, and consider placing it as site of the day. It's been about 24 hours since studio:cmd was placed in the forefront, and I would 'pass the torch' as it were, with honour if you chose Gloomycus.

    Thanks all!

    J

  12. #12
    general rule bender Gloomycus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    ontario canada
    Posts
    1,538
    Originally posted by studio:cmd
    Thanks to Flashkit and jstarkey for placing studio:cmd [activemedia] v02.2 as site of the day.

    It is a great honour, and has brought a lot of traffic my way.

    Glommycus, I am noticing sour grapes from yourself, and granted, inko.cjb.net is a fine site - you have worked hard, it shows, and yes, I concur that it deserves a site of the day placement.

    After all, Flashkit is about community and member support, therefore it should only go with the FK direction that its own members are chosen when their work reaches a level of standard expertise and professionalism.

    studio:cmd [activemedia] v02.2 was noticed and linked by FK some time ago Gloomycus, and therefore I would believe that this is the reason it was placed... That and white-pony promoting it (albeit un-nervingly) everywhere he goes.

    jstarkey, I think you should take a good look at inko.cjb.net, and consider placing it as site of the day. It's been about 24 hours since studio:cmd was placed in the forefront, and I would 'pass the torch' as it were, with honour if you chose Gloomycus.

    Thanks all!

    J
    Thanks for the comments. Sorry if I sounded angry, but it was because it was my understanding that the newest sites were nominable for the site of the day, and because the date of teh submission for your site was earlier than mine, it had its chance.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    854

    criteria for SOTD

    Perhaps it would be a good idea to draw up some criteria (and post it) for SOTD and have a panel who would select each recipient.

    At the moment it seems to be hit and miss and the selection procedure seems almost non-existent.

    If members are allowed to complain about not getting a SOTD and then they end up getting it.......etc, etc.

    You could end up with a free for all!



  14. #14
    general rule bender Gloomycus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    ontario canada
    Posts
    1,538

    Re: criteria for SOTD

    Originally posted by rooney
    Perhaps it would be a good idea to draw up some criteria (and post it) for SOTD and have a panel who would select each recipient.

    At the moment it seems to be hit and miss and the selection procedure seems almost non-existent.

    If members are allowed to complain about not getting a SOTD and then they end up getting it.......etc, etc.

    You could end up with a free for all!


    i only complained because my site was newly submitted, and i thought only newly submitted ones were eligible.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width

HTML5 Development Center