-
-
-
cool you guys really know yer stuff
-
Ximensions.com
Can anyone prove that 2+2=4?
-
Originally posted by Sul
Can anyone prove that 2+2=4?
yes coz if you got 2 apples in front of you then you add another 2 apples then count them all you get 4 apples (its right coz ive just testedt it )
-
Flashkit historian
Yeah that's great with apples
but what happens when you use peaches?
then the math gets fuzzy cause peaches have fuzz on them.
-
true but if you wash the peaches then it all becomes as clear as the water used to wash them
-
No!
x^2 = x*x = x+x+x+x+...(x times)
d/dx (x^2) = d/dx (x+x+x+...)
=> 2x = 1+1+1+...(x times)
=> 2x = x
=> 2x / x = x / x
=> 2 = 1
j
-
-
x^2 = x*x = x+x+x+x+...(x times)
d/dx (x^2) = d/dx (x+x+x+...)
=> 2x = 1+1+1+...(x times)
=> 2x = x
=> 2x / x = x / x
=> 2 = 1
HAHA! CAN'T DEVIDE BY X!!! WHAT IF X IS 0?!
You can prove that sheep can fly if you devide by zero!
And btw-
from d/dx (x^2) = d/dx (x+x+x+...) to 2x = 1+1+1+...(x times), something doesn't make any sense...
d/dx (x^2) = d/dx (x+x+x+...) /(d/dx)
x^2 = (x+x+x+...) /x <-- which CAN'T be done!
x = 1+1+1+...(x times) <-- now that makes sense!
x = x
but how did you get to:
2x= 1+1+1+...(x times)??
-
No!
Originally posted by halflifedarknes
HAHA! CAN'T DEVIDE BY X!!! WHAT IF X IS 0?!
You can prove that sheep can fly if you devide by zero!
And btw-
from d/dx (x^2) = d/dx (x+x+x+...) to 2x = 1+1+1+...(x times), something doesn't make any sense...
d/dx (x^2) = d/dx (x+x+x+...) /(d/dx)
x^2 = (x+x+x+...) /x <-- which CAN'T be done!
x = 1+1+1+...(x times) <-- now that makes sense!
x = x
but how did you get to:
2x= 1+1+1+...(x times)??
It uses derivatives (calculas)
x^2 = x*x = x+x+x+x+...(x times)
// x squared is x*x,
// 2*x is x+x(2 times)
// 3*x is x+x+x (3 times)
// so x*x is x+x+x...(x times)
d/dx (x^2) = d/dx (x+x+x+...)
//take the derivative of both sides
// derivative of x squared is 2*x
// derivative (x+x+x+...) is
// derivative of x + derivative of x + ...
// the derivative of x is 1, so derivative of x+x+x+...(x times) is
// 1+1+1+...(x times) = x
=> 2x = 1+1+1+...(x times)
=> 2x = x // true, only if x is zero, but x is a variable, it could have been 2, 3, 4...
=> 2x / x = x / x // so if x != 0
=> 2 = 1 // then 2 = 1
The trick isn't in the division, that actual problem lies in the fact that you can only take the derivative of a continuous expression (in this case), but here, it's implied, but not directly stated, that x must be a non-negative integer. If x = 0.5, then x^2 = x*x = x+x+x+...(x times) = 0.5 + 0.5 + ... (0.5 times) doesn;t make much sense. So x is not continuous and therefore the derivative cannot be taken giving us the falacy in the argument.
j
-
It uses derivatives (calculas)
So that's what it is...
I didn't know that it is written like that...
Sothat DOES makes sense, sorta... If X is an absolute number, and not 0...
-
all this fuss for 2+2 lol
-
madskool.wordpress.com
That is a cool trick yasunobu13. I'll remember that one.
AIR, ActionScript 3, Flex and Flash expert and freelance developer
-
If a bear ****s in the woods, does it make a sound?
-
ahh but do bears realy s**t in the woods..?
-
SWARTSENAIGER FOR PRESIDENT !!!!!!!!!!!
FREE 's to all the bears in the woods !
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|