Bacardidj.com - version 3

[[3S]]

http://www.bacardidj.com
Made by http://www.agencynet.com

I liked the v2 (wa007) version more.

[KevinD]

ammagad... this is the worst version yet, did they forgot to adjust the framerate or did my comp just aged 5 years :/

[crinkler]

kind of goofy, pretty much the old site just butchered.

[breadlegs]

poor in comparrison to previous versions

shame

[CNL83]

How come they didnt stick witih 2A? Didnt they go through like 3 web design companies? The 2A version was the better...

[villain2]

2A probably got too expensive for them hehehe j/k

Well, I think it's good for us that companies will change their designers every so often, means more work out there.

But yes, this version is clearly the worst.

[7year]

I don't really like it either. The glasses effect on the guy on the home page is cool, but other than that... Well i do like agencyNet's portfolio site. Its nothing spectacular, but it is good work.

[[3S]]

Originally posted by CNL83
How come they didnt stick witih 2A?

2A didn't designed version 2, they just programmed the flash DJ mixer technology. The previous layout was design/flashed by - http://www.wa007.com

[sk8Krog]

ugly.

[hanratty21]

u-g-l-y ...and lame.

Not to mention that this agency.net logo looks awfully familiar....



RH

[stevietat]

felt sorta too cluttered. It's not totally awful (I do like that glasses effect) But not really an improvement.

[njproduction]

Originally posted by hanratty21
u-g-l-y ...and lame.

Not to mention that this agency.net logo looks awfully familiar....



RH

Very good observation.
By the way, I agree with most of the guys - This version is no good

[mr. freak]

It's not bad.
But in comparison to their 2Advanced(!) and then WA007(!) versions, this no-name version is "meh."

Also, runs like crappola. Dunno if that's just Safari acting up, but it feels like about 15 fps.

[jankratochvil]

not cool

[slayerment]

I like it although I wish I was old enough to see the rest of the site.

[whispers]

Originally posted by mr. freak
It's not bad.
But in comparison to their 2Advanced(!) and then WA007(!) versions, this no-name version is "meh."

Also, runs like crappola. Dunno if that's just Safari acting up, but it feels like about 15 fps.

IE too...clips moving "SLOOOOOOW".... to much going on...that slows the animations of other things... KAKA...

-whispers-