-
I Mastered Dead Technology
Originally Posted by FlashLackey
Assuming that there is a correct medical solution and equal competency, you could have the option between different costs.
And do you honestly think that is going to happen? Considering the requirements for equal competency? How often does a severe symptom have multiple accepted correct medical solutions?
ONLY RON PAUL AND ALUMINUM FOIL CAN SAVE YOU NOW!
annoy your politician fairtax.org, a political forum
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabris, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.
-
Hood Rich
Originally Posted by TallGuyLittleCar
And do you honestly think that is going to happen? Considering the requirements for equal competency? How often does a severe symptom have multiple accepted correct medical solutions?
I don't follow what you are asking.
I am saying that if all other things are equal, two options (two different doctors of equal competency, recommending the same procedure) could charge different prices. Are you saying that nobody doing the same thing charges different amounts?
Last edited by FlashLackey; 06-29-2009 at 07:36 PM.
"We don't estimate speeches." - CBO Director Doug Elmendorf
-
Chaos
Originally Posted by TallGuyLittleCar
And do you honestly think that is going to happen? Considering the requirements for equal competency? How often does a severe symptom have multiple accepted correct medical solutions?
All the ****ing time in the sports world.
Its a constant battle between team doctors and players personal doctors.
For instance Curt shilling last year. At the end of the 2007 season he signed a new contact with the red sox, shortly there after he felt some discomfort in his shoulder and got some tests done, He had some pretty severe damage in his rotator cuff, enough so that he could'nt pitch anymore. The team doctors said, no surgeory, just rehab it, and you will be good to go by the middle of the season, Curts doctor said, are you ****ing insane no, get the sugeory now, then rehab and you will be good to go if not this year then next year for sure.
Curt opted for the team doctors, rehabed for most of the year then just about mid season hit an invisible wall, everything fell apart, the rehab was not helping enough and he got surgeory, he most likely will never pitch in the majors again.
thats why we have the phrase second opinion.
you have cancer and you have 97 days to live
you have cancer but i think if we do these things and take this medicen you may live for years to come.
-
I Mastered Dead Technology
Originally Posted by silverx2
All the ****ing time in the sports world.
Its a constant battle between team doctors and players personal doctors.
For instance Curt shilling last year. At the end of the 2007 season he signed a new contact with the red sox, shortly there after he felt some discomfort in his shoulder and got some tests done, He had some pretty severe damage in his rotator cuff, enough so that he could'nt pitch anymore. The team doctors said, no surgeory, just rehab it, and you will be good to go by the middle of the season, Curts doctor said, are you ****ing insane no, get the sugeory now, then rehab and you will be good to go if not this year then next year for sure.
Curt opted for the team doctors, rehabed for most of the year then just about mid season hit an invisible wall, everything fell apart, the rehab was not helping enough and he got surgeory, he most likely will never pitch in the majors again.
This example shows that between two options they were not equal. One was correct and one was incorrect. it was a choice over long term vs short term or price vs quality. If you are going to be selling a piece of legislation it will not be received well if you ask the population to make those sorts of choices concerning healthcare.
The sports world is not a very good case study as they are in the business of pushing their bodies to the limit.
thats why we have the phrase second opinion.
you have cancer and you have 97 days to live
you have cancer but i think if we do these things and take this medicen you may live for years to come.
and if you went for option 1, died, and your family learned about option 2 would their be the possibility of a malpractice suit?
ONLY RON PAUL AND ALUMINUM FOIL CAN SAVE YOU NOW!
annoy your politician fairtax.org, a political forum
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabris, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.
-
I Mastered Dead Technology
Originally Posted by FlashLackey
I don't follow what you are asking.
I am saying that if all other things are equal, two options (two different doctors of equal competency, recommending the same procedure) could charge different prices. Are you saying that nobody doing the same thing charges different amounts?
yes. In the same geological area two doctors of equal competency will charge the same for the same procedure. At least that has been my experience.
ONLY RON PAUL AND ALUMINUM FOIL CAN SAVE YOU NOW!
annoy your politician fairtax.org, a political forum
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabris, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.
-
Chaos
thats not how it worked on the first few seasons of everwood, but whatev.
-
I Mastered Dead Technology
ONLY RON PAUL AND ALUMINUM FOIL CAN SAVE YOU NOW!
annoy your politician fairtax.org, a political forum
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabris, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.
-
Hood Rich
Originally Posted by TallGuyLittleCar
yes. In the same geological area two doctors of equal competency will charge the same for the same procedure. At least that has been my experience.
However, if they are competing with each other, one could charge less than the other in order to get more business. No?
"We don't estimate speeches." - CBO Director Doug Elmendorf
-
supervillain
I've seen competition on smaller things... but not standard, bigger procedures.
-
Spartan Mop Warrior
The only time I've seen real competition in doctor rates is for cosmetic surgery and lasik.
I see/hear ads for those all the time on radio, TV, mailers, etc.
Other types of doctors/surgery not so much.
I can just see the commercials now...
"Come on down to Doctor Bob's bargain surgery barn!
This week's special, half-price angioplasty.
2 for 1 kidney transplants, while supplies last!
And remember, all Doctor Bob's organs come with a limited 90 day money back guarantee!"
-
supervillain
Dentists... I went to two of them that were closeby to my house, then one closer to the office.
Insane price diff.
-
Hood Rich
As everyone knows, our health care expenses are increasing faster than inflation. That means that there is room to lower costs just in the profit margin, without changing quality.
If there was more competition involved in the equation, doctors would be under greater pressure to give a fair market price for procedures.
"We don't estimate speeches." - CBO Director Doug Elmendorf
-
Flashkit historian
-
pablo cruisin'
Originally Posted by FlashLackey
...doctors would be under greater pressure to give a fair market price for procedures.
I posted some links earlier in this thread which break down the cost(s) of healthcare. Docs are not the problem. If anyone is, blame lawyers, insurance, and large pharma.
"Why does it hurt when I pee?" -- F. Zappa |
-
Hood Rich
Originally Posted by Frets
Hey FL got stats to back that up?
Google "rate of inflation" and "cost of health care in the US".
Originally Posted by hanratty21
I posted some links earlier in this thread which break down the cost(s) of healthcare. Docs are not the problem. If anyone is, blame lawyers, insurance, and large pharma.
Docs are not the problem. However, they are part of the problem (as the data from Fret's link supports in Exhibit 15). And I don't blame them as if they collectively are bad people, purposely exploiting the system. That would be more like characters such as John Edwards.
You're correct that lawyers, insurance and so on are right in there. I was focusing on the example that TGLC had brought up just to make the point about how competition drives down prices in general. Raising the issue that consumers don't typically choose doctors based on price would have been beside that point.
The root of the problem is the relationship between consumers and health insurance companies (not between consumers and doctors). If that problem were sorted out (via increased competition) the doctors prices would fall in line as well.
"We don't estimate speeches." - CBO Director Doug Elmendorf
-
I Mastered Dead Technology
Originally Posted by gerbick
Dentists... I went to two of them that were closeby to my house, then one closer to the office.
Insane price diff.
I have encountered that to. But i have to wonder if there is relevant difference in quality of work. I have a $500 dollar crown turn into a $3000 bridge turn into $20000 implants. Not fun.
ONLY RON PAUL AND ALUMINUM FOIL CAN SAVE YOU NOW!
annoy your politician fairtax.org, a political forum
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabris, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.
-
I Mastered Dead Technology
Originally Posted by FlashLackey
As everyone knows, our health care expenses are increasing faster than inflation. That means that there is room to lower costs just in the profit margin, without changing quality.
It should also be noted that health care technology and science is increasing faster as well. What would have killed you a decade ago is now not such a big deal. That is partially why health care costs increase so much.
ONLY RON PAUL AND ALUMINUM FOIL CAN SAVE YOU NOW!
annoy your politician fairtax.org, a political forum
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabris, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.
-
Spartan Mop Warrior
If we really wanted to see competition and competitive rates wouldn't there have to be an increase in the number of doctors?
Basic supply and demand?
Isn't the prohibitive cost of higher education, especially medical, an overlooked factor in this whole debate?
-
pablo cruisin'
Originally Posted by Loyal Rogue
Isn't the prohibitive cost of higher education, especially medical, an overlooked factor in this whole debate?
Not by me. I'm right there with you. All this talk of competition and docs lowering their prices, etc. completely discounts the concept that these guys and gals spend 10+ years in post high school education and amass 100's of thousands of dollars in debt in order to provide the service which most in this thread seem to want to pay next to nothing for.
"Why does it hurt when I pee?" -- F. Zappa |
-
Hood Rich
Originally Posted by TallGuyLittleCar
It should also be noted that health care technology and science is increasing faster as well. What would have killed you a decade ago is now not such a big deal. That is partially why health care costs increase so much.
Very true. Our health care should cost more relative to most of the world because of that. What we don't want is for costs to be forced so low that doctors and medical innovations go abroad. Still, I think that prices going up at more than double the rate of inflation per year is above and beyond the rate of increased technology costs.
Originally Posted by Loyal Rogue
If we really wanted to see competition and competitive rates wouldn't there have to be an increase in the number of doctors?
Basic supply and demand?
I don't think so. That isn't where the bottleneck is. There is already competition between doctors.
The area where there isn't enough competition is with insurance companies. They get away with inflating their rates for these reasons:
A) Their customers (employers) get a huge tax break on that cost and thus are encouraged to maximize their employee compensation through larger health costs. It's a way for them to pay their employees 2 times on the dollar. The dirty secret is that tax-payers are essentially paying half of that via lost tax revenue from businesses.
B) The individual consumers (employees) don't see the cost as something to scrutinize. Just the opposite, instead of wanting an affordable plan, employees tend to feel that they are getting better paid when their employers choose an expensive plan. They don't realize that they could be taking the inflated portion of the price home in their paycheck and get a health plan priced at market value with the same quality.
C) Even if an employee connects the dots and is unhappy with their plan, they don't typically have the option to leave their employer plan to choose another; the key component of consumer decision needed for competition to move prices toward market levels.
Originally Posted by Loyal Rogue
Isn't the prohibitive cost of higher education, especially medical, an overlooked factor in this whole debate?
I think it factors in with everything else. I just don't think it's as large of a component as other things because the terms to pay off student loans are pretty lax. A student typically has 30 years to pay off such loans at a government guaranteed low rate. So, the pressure from that cost should be relatively low.
Last edited by FlashLackey; 07-01-2009 at 08:18 PM.
"We don't estimate speeches." - CBO Director Doug Elmendorf
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|