[alpha][fps] raycaster

Printable View

03-10-2005, 03:30 PM
Kianis

[alpha][fps] raycaster

I recently started this raycaster. No texture mapping yet.

So, what's your fps? Try out a few different levels of quality (use page up and page down to change). Thanks :)

link
03-10-2005, 03:50 PM
VENGEANCE MX

At the highest quality, I was allegedly getting about 9 to 10. Lowest was usually around 15. Good job.
03-10-2005, 03:50 PM
WilloughbyJackson

Quality 5... 14 - 16 fps.

Quality 1... 4 - 6 fps.

Pentium 4, 2.99 GHz, 512 MB of Ram

-pXw
03-10-2005, 04:49 PM
strille

Quality 5: 16 fps
Quality 1: 5 fps

AMD 1400, 512Mb Ram, IE6

Good job. I agree, it's a great tutorial.
03-10-2005, 05:00 PM
Trickman

Firefox Pentium 4, 2.8 GHz, 1GB of Ram

Quality 5: 16 fps
Quality 1: 10 fps

Andre Michelle has an open source raycaster for gamepackage andre-michelle.com
03-10-2005, 05:28 PM
lapo73

With quality between 15 and 3 I always got about the same value: ~16 fps
Then going down to 2 and 1 really killed the fps with values around 6,7

Tested under Firefox and IE, P4 3.0Ghz

Lapo
03-10-2005, 06:45 PM
LeechmasterB

Quality 5... ~16 fps.

Quality 1... ~13 fps.

Looks good so far.
03-10-2005, 06:49 PM
Kianis

Thanks for all the replies! : )

Quote:

Andre Michelle has an open source raycaster for gamepackage andre-michelle.com

Thanks for the tip, I've seen it ^^ Don't forget Strille's kickass raycaster, written for flash 5! :O
03-10-2005, 08:30 PM
kendude

Quality 5... 13 - 16 fps.

Quality 3... 6 - 9 fps.

Quality 1... 5 fps.

iMac g4 867 Mhz 768 meg o'ram

Pretty cool!
03-11-2005, 12:57 AM
Hasufel

Amd Athlon 64 bits 3000 + 1GB Ram + Firefox:
Quality 5 > 16 fps
Quality 3 > 16 fps
Quality 1 > 13 fps

Very nice :)
I can see and feel people prepare things for flash 8 :p
03-11-2005, 08:53 AM
erixon

Flash is not the right language for doing a raycast engine. But if you want to do it because of learning well... what is you goal with it?
03-11-2005, 12:03 PM
Kianis

Quote:

Originally posted by erixon
Flash is not the right language for doing a raycast engine. But if you want to do it because of learning well... what is you goal with it?

You're absolutely right. It's way to slow - and I haven't even added the texture mapping.
Yup, it just seemed to be an interesting challange. Got no real plans for it.. except for the traversal algorithm, it may come in handy.

Quote:

Originally posted by Hasufel
I can see and feel people prepare things for flash 8 :p

Haha :D Let's cross our fingers and hope fp8 is as fast as they say it is ;)