Flash Lite Standalone Application VS Mobile Web Browser Protocol

Here I want to debug the flash lite developer's mind (obviously the new developers of flash lite) on a confusion of web base mobile protocol or a flash lite base standalone application.

The question is why Flash Lite standalone application and why a mobile web browser?

Is flash lite or any flash player support in mobile browser?

From an user point of view, which one is more economic, faster, easer to use, more interactive, more reliable way to represent an integrated application service on mobile device?

All the issue in your mind should express here.

Welcome all to share all your experiences about flash lite with examples if needed ......


Regards


marlopax

Flash Lite 3 runs as a standard web browser plug-in on series 60 v3 fp1 and 2 devices.

Flash Lite 3 will run as a activeX control for Windows Mobile IE 6 for WM6.1 and greater.

Mobile Opera 9.5 has support for Flash Lite 3 as a plug-in as well, so any device running this browser also includes Flash Lite browser capability.

There are other types of devices with Flash/Flash Lite as a browser enhancement such as Sony MyLo.

As to whether you should use FL in standalone or browser just depends upon what you are trying to do.

Thank You hp3

My question is:

If there is a matter of showing text, picture, video and hearing of sound, why do people browse a particular site (example: youtube) every time on mobile browser?

Web page has many other things (like advertisement etc.) will also download.
Whereas from a flash lite application it will download the actual data which the user wants to do?

From my point of view, for dedicated site mobile user should use flash lite application for faster download and also to save money.....


marlopax