Is Flash Kit stealing ideas??
A letter I wrote to Flash Kit a few weeks ago:
"My question is: Are you ripping people off?
I have looked through despriptions of movies in the new section. Some have excellent
descriptions. Others have no useful descriptions at all., not mentioning actionscript features
nor anything else related to Flash.
I have seen movies so simple and basic its almost embarressing. People submit
buttons(!!!) and get them accepted. People submit samples of the simplest features of Flash
and get them accepted.
AND, I`m seeing submissions that show ZERO sense of visual design.
I got rejected, among other things, a fully actionscript driven dancer/figure, that have bodyparts
that can be dragged around, and a set of fully scripted movements constituting various "dances".
You may say its a fairly advanced setup.
I got rejected an actionscript driven paint program. This program contains samples
of many Flash 5 as features, such as color, alpha etc. It also presents a clean and functional interface.
I also got a few other movies rejected for reasons beyond me.
I dont aspire to the title Master of The Flash Universe, nor do I believe my work is
that new nor unique. And admittingly, I DONT write the most beautiful code in the world.
But, WHEN COMPARING the quality of a bunch of the movies you have accepted (including some of the new stuff), and my
own, rejected work, and when comparing my descriptions to a bunch of others, I find no reason for rejecting my work.
It makes me wonder if you are ripping people off, stealing their ideas and work.
I base that also on the fact that I submitted 5 movies over a year ago, got email confirmation
that they were received, and then heard nothing ever again. Needless to say the movies never showed up
on your site.
Oeyvind Toft"
Cant help but airing my views. There are lots of excellent stuff
in the movie section. But lets face it, there are also tons of pure crap. I dont like to be beaten by pure crap.
Oeyvind
Re: Is Flash Kit stealing ideas??
Quote:
Originally posted by bergen
I have looked through despriptions of movies in the new section. Some have excellent
descriptions. Others have no useful descriptions at all., not mentioning actionscript features
nor anything else related to Flash.
And the dates on them are? At the beginning of this year things started to change and descriptions are now an absolute requirement.
Quote:
I have seen movies so simple and basic its almost embarressing. People submit
buttons(!!!) and get them accepted. People submit samples of the simplest features of Flash
and get them accepted.
And people download those buttons and use them. And newbies download the simple things and learn from them. It's a balance thing.
Quote:
I got rejected, among other things, a fully actionscript driven dancer/figure, that have bodyparts
that can be dragged around, and a set of fully scripted movements constituting various "dances".
You may say its a fairly advanced setup.
Are you referring to Disco Girl?
Quote:
I got rejected an actionscript driven paint program. This program contains samples
of many Flash 5 as features, such as color, alpha etc. It also presents a clean and functional interface.
There is at least one already available for download with these features and more.
Quote:
But, WHEN COMPARING the quality of a bunch of the movies you have accepted (including some of the new stuff), and my
own, rejected work, and when comparing my descriptions to a bunch of others, I find no reason for rejecting my work.
There are quite a few requirements now.
Quote:
It makes me wonder if you are ripping people off, stealing their ideas and work.
Visionray!!!!! Are you stealing code again?
Quote:
I base that also on the fact that I submitted 5 movies over a year ago, got email confirmation
that they were received, and then heard nothing ever again. Needless to say the movies never showed up
on your site.
Unfortunately, at the beginning of this year there was a corrution in the movies database. We lost over 1300 entries. it was beyond my control.