i always knew you were a good ole boy..;) ..if your gonna pull out the charger, you need to pull out the general...
tom wopat says it's the best!
http://www.dukefarm.com/images/cynthia/luke.jpg
Printable View
i always knew you were a good ole boy..;) ..if your gonna pull out the charger, you need to pull out the general...
tom wopat says it's the best!
http://www.dukefarm.com/images/cynthia/luke.jpg
the mustang for newer hands down. thunderbird only for nascar. the camarro is nice but the doors are fiberglass and the fenders are rubber. the mustang body is all metal. besides the power, there are many aftermarket parts available to customize. and when you got the hammer down at 110 mph an all metal body is a little more assuring. if you want to go older late 60's are the true muscle cars. but watch the mid 70's cars that is when people started buying the imports and american companies started trying new things to keep up. unless you like experiments and working on your car.
peace
casey
out of those three I would take the thunderbird without a doubt. You have a v8, as apposed to a v6 (gas milleage probably won't be that different). You also get a IRS with the thunderbird if i'm not mistaken.
1987 buick grand national or gnx or even t-type
NICE!!!
its out of topic but look at that :eek:
http://www.exoticcarworld.com/images...GTR/CY61-1.jpg
http://www.exoticcarworld.com/images...TR/CY61-26.jpg
DigitalOne: I am sort of ill at you refering to a v6 mustang and v6 camaro as muscle cars.
I own a '00 z28.. believe it or not these newer '98 or newer z28's and trans ams.. get 25mpg or better.
i currently get about 27mpg!! out of my v8 camaro. i picked up the car used.. '00 dark blue z28 w/ 30k miles on the clock. for $13,900
the car has the same motor as the corvettes.. it dynoed 324 horespower at the wheels bone stock. That means 360hp @ the crank roughly.
I have spent $1,200 in bolt on modifications and a 'baby' cam.. the stock cam out of a '02 z06.. now the car is at 420 horsepower.. 371 at the wheels. (drive train loss)
buy those extra two cylinders.. they are worth the fun they envoke :mrpimp:
Obviously, I'll never know for sure, but I bet the inside of that thing smells like pee.Quote:
Do you have a digital camera ?Quote:
Originally posted by Insomniak
DigitalOne: I am sort of ill at you refering to a v6 mustang and v6 camaro as muscle cars.
I own a '00 z28.. believe it or not these newer '98 or newer z28's and trans ams.. get 25mpg or better.
i currently get about 27mpg!! out of my v8 camaro. i picked up the car used.. '00 dark blue z28 w/ 30k miles on the clock. for $13,900
the car has the same motor as the corvettes.. it dynoed 324 horespower at the wheels bone stock. That means 360hp @ the crank roughly.
I have spent $1,200 in bolt on modifications and a 'baby' cam.. the stock cam out of a '02 z06.. now the car is at 420 horsepower.. 371 at the wheels. (drive train loss)
buy those extra two cylinders.. they are worth the fun they envoke :mrpimp:
Some picture would be great :)
The Mustang is a chick's car. It was originally designed as a muscle car for women.Quote:
Originally posted by alty29
Mustang, without a doubt.
I much prefer the so called 'rice rockets' than american muscle,
the big 5ltr engines etc are way too heavy and lazy an engine.
but hey if thats what your after, defo go for a mustang! there nuts!
the 5 liter v8's often weight just 50 to 100 pounds more than the honda vtecs and the like that don't deliver the same amount of hp(stock) and certainly do not deliver the same value.Quote:
Originally posted by slinky2000
the big 5ltr engines etc are way too heavy and lazy an engine.
Haha. That's true! It was the first American sports car to be marketed toward women as well as men. Also the first affordable sports car.Quote:
Originally posted by asun2art
The Mustang is a chick's car. It was originally designed as a muscle car for women.
It's the whole girl wanting to ride horses thing. ;)
I beat every rice rocket I ever raced in every distance (short as well). They make up for their weight with much greater torque than the little toys. I even ousted a brand new Porsche 911... until we hit the curves! :DQuote:
Originally posted by slinky2000
the big 5ltr engines etc are way too heavy and lazy an engine.
im confuse.Quote:
Originally posted by asun2art
The Mustang is a chick's car. It was originally designed as a muscle car for women.
http://71hoss.freeservers.com/images...iller_beer.jpg
what he meant was that it was the first unisex muscle car...for both...men and women. which by default, makes it a nancy car...
the girl owns the mustang, if you drink miller beer she will talk to you.Quote:
Originally posted by atRax
im confuse.
glad i could clear that up.
Quote:
Originally posted by TallGuyLittleCar
the 5 liter v8's often weight just 50 to 100 pounds more than the honda vtecs and the like that don't deliver the same amount of hp(stock) and certainly do not deliver the same value.
my mate I'm livin with worked over in America and has a green mustang v8 and he hated it he was tellin me all about it he's got a sierra cosworth 2.0 turbo and is far quicker than anytihng he drove in his time over there.
I'm just goin by what I've heard, but I do love the wee cars ;)
My best friend has a thunderbird, 94 I believe, and it sucks. It's in great shape, but it just isn't a good car. And the mustang will get you chicks, you cant compare the too.
uh no.Quote:
Originally posted by alty29
And the mustang will get you chicks,
If you want a car to get you chicks it better be a BMW, Audi or a Mercedes, foreign etc.
Or just a blue neon light around the liscense plate....