First, when I said 'I edited my post', I meant 'because you read it before I had, and I wanted you to re-read it' - it was initially more abrupt than I'd intended. I shall take your use of the same phrase to mean the same thing - though I need to stretch my imagination a little, there (again) :DQuote:
Originally posted by gerbick
Until you have anything worthy of conversation on that matter, you are worthy of only being ignored.
I edited my post as well.
This takes me back to the 'clique' and 'pointless threads' issues a few weeks ago.
You seem to be implying that only people who agree with this (any) topic/subject should post (that would fall under 'pointless')
And you also seem to be saying that I'm only worthy of being ignored as long as I have a different opinion (that would come under 'clique').
I, on the other hand, simply asked (in a jokey, and definitely not nasty way) what the point of these kind of upgrades was. Furthermore, I tried to smooth over your initial rumblings, but to no avail.
One thing is for certain, nothing I said was offensive - and certainly not as much as in some of the things that the clique gets up to in almost every pointless post it is involved in (that is NOT saying all posts are pointless, by the way - read the grammar ;) )
As a matter of fact, the most coherent response to all this came from the original poster. I respect that. And although the practise still doesn't do anything for me, having it put like that does make you think, and understand where some people are coming from - certainly in his case with the lights and stuff.
It really is a shame that this happens almost every time, Gerbick, with the accusations and 'hurt' feelings. And I'm sure you are absolutely right - the fault is entirely with me, even in all those threads I never post in... :D :D :D
