I agree with everything said above... great work!
The water line and those tentacles look amazing! Were those from stock?
Printable View
I agree with everything said above... great work!
The water line and those tentacles look amazing! Were those from stock?
Here comes the second. Ct, if I'm letting you down with these, let me know.
I think this is better than the first one.
http://www.briancomeau.net/fk/volley2ctranter.jpg
Comments/Crits always welcome!
Good luck on the next one Chris. We've got a good pace going.
Very nice davulf, I actually would have prefered it without the eyes, perhaps without the box at all.
Without those things, it's pretty much just layered stock with some levels, some clipping masks, some masking, some brushing.Quote:
Originally Posted by alty29
Adding those I think gives more feeling to the volley. I agree that the eyes look a little crazy, but the warning on the box says 'Infectante' or 'Contagious (infection virus)'.
Thanks for the comments though :).
criticism - take cover!
Overall it looks very sloppy to me...the blending/lighting at the base of the grass is not in agreement with the top of the soil layer. The grass itself is a poor quality stock, very 'jpeg compression'ish'. It looks to me as if you were going for a speed record cutting out that box...have a little more patience and you'll get a much better result. And the eyes definately don't do the image any credit...They're just goofy looking, and neutralize any 'creepy' effect you may or may not have been going for.
I have seen some pretty nice stuff from you recently, which is why I'm trying to be so thorough and specific, I don't mean to shoot you down, just to give you something to think about next time.
Thanks for the comments Ond. I'll try to respond as best as I can. I didn't even notice about the lighting of the grass and the top of the soil, although I can see what you mean. I have a 'lighting' layer where I brushed in order to make it look like the edge of a wall or something. The grass itself was from sxc.hu and was a rather high resolution image. I did scale it down in order to fit it, but I'm surprised it kept the compression. As for the box, the black around it is actually on a different layer and is brushed in to try to give it depth. I guess you're right about it looking a little off.
As for the eyes, I originally thought they were a good idea, but now that everyone is mentioning it, they have lost their appeal. I probably should have just left it without. I suppose I tend to feel that unless there is really obvious things done to an image that I will be called out for not doing anything.
It's a compliment to hear you say that you've seen some nice stuff from me. I really have been trying lately. I've been at this for about 6 months, and I'm glad I can see some progession (check out www.briancomeau.net for my images in chronological order).
Anyways, I'm glad for the comments. Thanks man.
http://www.strachanporcelain.com/images/jellyfish.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Dricciotti
The water was partialy from a tiny stock duplicated and then partial created from scratch.
And thanks!
Re the blur, it was supposed to be depth of feild, but also I blurred a few areas to try and recreate a 'water on the lens' sort of feel. Might have done a better job, but I'm still fairly happy with it.
Might have to slow things down for a bit, going out today and have England vs Australia rugby match this evening. But as soon as possible :)Quote:
Originally Posted by DaVulf
I think the eyes could have been ok on that one, if there were different, less comic eyes.
Sounds good Chris.
Here Ond, this is for you. I messed with the lighting, and re-did the grass, I also fixed the outline on the box. What do you think now?
http://www.briancomeau.net/fk/volley2ctranter2.jpg
D: that looked so good right up until the dirt started showing...
clever consept, but I have to agree with most of the other crits here.
http://www.ctranter.co.uk/flashkit/b...liff/hand3.jpg
And before I 'cracked' the image here:
http://www.ctranter.co.uk/flashkit/b...liff/hand4.jpg
Yeah wasn't sure which I prefered, so as it's my battle and I make the rules I am posting both. :p:
You choose which one you want to use.
Wow Ct, just wow.
oooh i like that a lot :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
unusual style.
i definitely prefer the uncracked one- appreciate the details more. if you wanted it cracked, maybe finer cracks would work- i find the cracks in the first one too in your face, and that subtracts from the rest of the image.
my only slight criticism would be that the highlight of the apple looks a little too bright i think.
[edit] although looking at it again, it does fit in with the lighting on the fingers, so maybe i am wrong......
i love the non-cracked version. Awesome CT, just awesome!
That is so good its scary.
Prefer the uncracked version.
Awesome CT!!!! Perfer the none cracked though.
DaVulf, I have to agree with what O said. The second version looks much better. Keep up the good work you 2.
im going against he grain and go with the cracked version, i think broken into pieces makes you look at it a little harder... and that means it will keep peoples attention and all art the object is to keep people looking and make them think about it....
it also helps hide the little inperfections, makes the blending of the hand into the roots a little better, the fingers also look better on the cracked version they stand out alot less.
also the dirty brush work on the diffrent shards is very well done.
Agreed. It looked like a stock. :)Quote:
also the dirty brush work on the diffrent shards is very well done.
Nice image CT. I'm going to have to go and say that I prefer the uncracked version as well. I think it is a personal preference thing, but at leats from my point of view it will be easier to manip than the cracked version. As far as the image itself goes, it looks like you hand painted it. I don't know where you find your stock man, but that looks ace. The hand and the apple seem as if they were one image. The way you blended the sky looks really nice as well.
Side note question: Can you draw freehand?
I'll start work after work ;).
Thanks everyone?
DaVulf - you mean... like with a pencil? :p