Printable View
Yes, yes it is.Quote:
Originally posted by TheOriginalFlashDavo
And it is only bloody compliancy for Christ's sake! It's not as if we're arguing for the sacrifice of everyone's first born is it??
Regardless, its always a good idea to be as compliant as possible while still creating what you are trying to go for, for all you know, there might be one person/group who are using a browser that doesn't support the code you are using.
then they should get a new broswer:D
I can't believe people are still talking about this website. It's no huge improvement on their last. However I did like how they didn't use anti-aliased text everywhere this time.
i actually like it more than i did before.
i started getting technical and then i had to go to a diff point of a view to look at it so that i am not so self biased.
*felt an urge to post on the 37th page*
Yes it is, but it's not always the most important thing, is it?Quote:
Originally posted by Gloomycus
Yes, yes it is.
Regardless, its always a good idea to be as compliant as possible while still creating what you are trying to go for, for all you know, there might be one person/group who are using a browser that doesn't support the code you are using.
For example, your site's not compliant, but does that effect the effectiveness of it? I don't think so, it's a great site.
Actually you will have a hard time finding a cool site in here that is actually compliant ;)
Is this thread finished yet?
just 1 more reply
how about adding a forum to the reviews section..."compliant sites" ....yeah bad idea cause there'd be no posts
BTW this is completely off topic but informative none-the-less. I'd recommend that no one here use verizon for anything. They are telenazis.
which siteQuote:
Originally posted by TheOriginalFlashDavo
Yes it is, but it's not always the most important thing, is it?
For example, your site's not compliant, but does that effect the effectiveness of it? I don't think so, it's a great site.
inko may not be totally compliant, but its viewed the same in all browsers.
I'm waiting for the day that one of my sites gets a 37 page thread :D
sorry for this post
Thanks for proving my point.Quote:
Originally posted by Gloomycus
inko may not be totally compliant, but its viewed the same in all browsers.
Next...
:D
when is version 5 coming out?
im allready working on it
ohh wait... you guys arent supposed to know i work for 2a.
i wish =(
You know at first when I saw 2advanced new site on the release date, i wasn't too impressed, prolly bc of over hype. but its been like 2 weeks or whatever since ive been, and im really impressed with it now. Really smooth animations, and their is a ton of info on the UI at once, but it all presents itself in a nice flowing manner. so. nice work and props to your team.
http://www.2advanced.com
Er... why not post this in the 2A thread?
No-Tec I did the same exact thing.
How about we just dont have a complete forum on them...
or thety need to have their own forum...
i vote that your post count goes down by 5 everytime you post a thread with "2a" in it. hear hear?
LoL. :D That might be hard to do though.... ;)Quote:
Originally posted by AxiomFlash
i vote that your post count goes down by 5 everytime you post a thread with "2a" in it. hear hear?
Just as a note, No-Tec's post does not include the exact term of "2a".
Sorry for going off topic so much. :p