Printable View
I think they're actually making a deal to come into the US TV schedule, not sure if it's new stuff or repackaged stuff they're done. Their Oz political stuff which won't make it to the US is probably some of their funniest. I don't know if they do US political stuff if it will be as good or follow too many stereotypes. We'll see.Quote:
Originally Posted by argonauta
What I said implied it wasn't unusual for more than 5. I used 5 because I didn't want to make anyone feel inadequate if they couldn't even hit that.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOriginalFlashDavo
Clearly after a 2 hour session, if you've only given her 5... well, that means it takes more than 20 minutes each. I would say the time can vary, but it is never more than 5 minutes. That would imply that the minimum for something like that would be 20 or so O's.
I think Gerbs is right though about all of this. It depends on what women are used to, what age group, and a whole lot of other factors. For instance, I'm sure in China (where scheduled sex is the norm) that they book out a 30 minute time-slot, and that is what it takes, get off or not.
Frankly, these things will differ the world over for the most part. It does make sense that they would vary even across the US. Maybe girls where silver lives have never had a real man, who knows? It doesn't mean that he is wrong though, he probably is right when talking about that area. Just as gerbs and greg are right when talking about their area.
I can't believe you guys wrote so many pages over the weekend. I wake up before the gf one day and get to check e-mail, and I see a bunch of notifications. Fun times.
I'm not really that interested in comparing wangs myself. The only point of merit of this thread was about half an hour being a overly "long" time, which I think consensus indicates it is not.
The rest is, well, comparing wangs. ;)
(Though it has been worth a good laugh!)
or maby your just doing it wrong. Again iv got an entire store of girls, which this has now gone to to ladies in the group that are in their 40's and a couple of them even in their 50'sQuote:
Originally Posted by DaVulf
They all agree that your all entirely bat**** crazy. They all dont want a guy on them for 2 hours straight. Im prety sure at this point nothing you have to say will change the fact that i have 18 or so girls ranging from 18 to 52 all saying that 2 hours is way longer then any of them would ever want at one time.
Thats pretty much the end of the discussion. Its great that your a god in bed and can go for 2 hours and give your girlfriend an orgasm every 5 minutes. Good for you, you can go get a job in the porno buisness. Not all women have leather vaginas.
*Applauds Silver's support for the Silicone Love Doll Owners Association
amazing...9 pages of debate, basically over how long is too long...and we haven't even got round to 'how long is too long' yet (please don't, there are medical/personal advice forums for such questions).
Sawing a lot of wood does not make one a wood-carver. Skillful and subtle use of tools, and lots of practice might, eventually.
david
But toying with a block of wood for 5 minutes make you a whittler, not a carver.
And silver... gotta say. If the well dries up that quickly, that's a sign of a lack of excitement.
Gerbick, I read the whole thing, basically to reach an end to it, and I'll quote you
Let It Go
Ich weiss... aber das ist zuviel spaz.
It's been let go by me. I just want it to be understood that there will be varying degrees to which people will call "normal"... I'm accepting of Silver's stance. It's just that my history and past don't support his claims, not even in the least.
*shrug*
Letting go... letting it go. I suggest others do the same.
Let's just close this thread.
Does the 5 minutes include the time you need to take out the ropes, chains and whip, and decide who's going to be the master and who the slave?
Set it to cable select and be done with it?
iv also let it go. Im just not about to let davulf claim a bunch of people i know, and my girlfriend specifical fall into a catagory of "never had a real man"
i submit to the jury, Evidence A, proving that DaVulf is full of crap about his love life:
Evidence A
Is he aboard the Starship Enterprise? Maybe women in the future really are sex-machines.
I dont need to see exibit B. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by lefteyewilly
LOL OK lefteye just convinced me, so keep going gentlemen, the change of target practice is refreshing too
Wow.
(You know we're just messing around, DaVulf. :grouphug::D)
I know. No worries. To be honest, that picture was taken in first year just before the Spring Formal. I wasn't dating anyone at that point. I didn't start dating seriously until the next fall.Quote:
Originally Posted by Genesis F5
I'm impressed you found one of my very first PS works though ;).
Oh, and silver, this was never between you and I, or who has more prowess in bed. It was merely a discussion of which is more the norm. I just wanted to get across the point that although you have asked so many people, it doesn't mean that is true for everyone. Each girl is different, and thats just the way things go. Now, I must go remove that picture in the event that my gf finds out that I watched star trek. lol ;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaVulf
Wow, its almost as if you have not read a single thing that was in this thread.
I said multiple times. Not every girl wants a guy that will go for a long time.
AS for more prowess in bed, i think that goes to you, 2 hours straight and 5 minutes per, thats an impressive 24-1 ratio your putting out. i think only sting and sea lions can do that.
This is like watching tennis...wait no- it's like watching ping pong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WannaBe_80z
i wonder if ping pong has an Anna kournikova...
*sighs*
I've already let it go, Silver. This argument is clearly not going to be resolved, so I'm just going to drop it. I'm not coming after you, I don't care. Clearly we both agree that not everyone is the same, so we're both arguing for the same point.
Either way, the idiot in the first post should have been able to finish before walking all over the damn house.
...damn social life on the evenings/weekends, I miss al the FKing fun...Quote:
Originally Posted by silverx2
I think I've hit on the problem here - these girls are all thinking of sex with Silver.
I've edited his post to clarify. :)
Now where is that? We need more threads with that in it.Quote:
Originally Posted by carly1979
You're forgetting one very significant contributing factor: amphetaminesQuote:
Originally Posted by DaVulf
Can keep you going for... hours... ;)
(so I've heard...)
There's an idea. Break into someone's house (while they're home), take some amphetamines, and then proceed to wank for the next hour or so while walking around the house, and hope nobody finds you.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOriginalFlashDavo
If he wanted to be all dangerous, then just do it fast. He got caught for idiocy.
More girls in bikinis playing pong!
this is the best one I could find: http://www.ittf.com/stories/pictures...9_06_large.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by WannaBe_80z
Forrest Gump is hotter.
I have a serious problem with the fact that you went straight to a man for a comparison.Quote:
Originally Posted by WannaBe_80z
That's just wrong. You could have said another woman... like Bea Arthur or Rosie O'Donnell.
Wait... those are women, right?
Forrest Gump is hotter then Rosie O'Donnell.
Hey, I didn't say that the guy wasn't an idiot, just that there were reasons why he was still at it an hour later.Quote:
Originally Posted by DaVulf
(Plus, did the story say he broke in? He might have been a friend?? A very strange friend, yes...)
Damn double posts!
From which angle?Quote:
Originally Posted by WannaBe_80z
That question is void as Rosie has 1000x more to chose from.
*barf*