Found this via Delicious:
How to make a Web 2.0 site
Someone was talking about making Flashkit more modern. Lets make it a social networking blog :p
Printable View
Found this via Delicious:
How to make a Web 2.0 site
Someone was talking about making Flashkit more modern. Lets make it a social networking blog :p
"Web 2.0" - I don't like that word!
I call it: "Dot com bubble reloaded." :D
Fredi
"Web 2.0" is a stupid concept.
Admittedly, many sites now offer user-generated content, but it's nothing new. Amazon is a "Web 2.0" site and that's been around since the dinosaurs, in internet years.
Speaking of which, I'm thinking of staring one soon :D (But I won't say Web 2.0)
I too hate "Web 2.0" and especially "Ajax". If you are a programmer, not a designer, then you should call it XMLHttpRequest(). I especially hate people who claim stuff uses Ajax because it is shiny and has rounded corners.
Man! Are they telling me .gif animations aren't "Web 2.0" ? http://www.gifanimations.com/Image/A...3/love_003.gif
Of course they are, you just have to make sure they have a background that doesn't match the page backgroundhttp://www.gifanimations.com/Image/A..._the_world.gif
what a bunch of tards- the article reminds alot of this:
[F8] how to create online rpg
most of the so called "web2.0" websites dont even work in all browsers as they are supposed to do because of specific browser Javascript functions.
Google´s writely and their spreadsheet tool or even the new yahoo mail dont work at all or propper in other browser other than IE or FF- and that sux big time because I really dislike those 2 browsers.
What it makes a hype is the media and the industry because they want something they can believe in just like HD or windowsVista. But never was a friend of such hypes neither am I concerning this topic
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1.../alph/24/f.gifhttp://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1.../alph/24/l.gifhttp://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1.../alph/24/a.gifhttp://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1.../alph/24/s.gifhttp://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1.../alph/24/h.gifhttp://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1.../alph/24/k.gifhttp://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1.../alph/24/i.gifhttp://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1.../alph/24/t.gif
welcome to web 2.0
http://www2.ing.unipi.it/~d7384/com_...C_ANIMATED.gif http://www2.ing.unipi.it/~d7384/com_...E_ANIMATED.GIF
something tells me that even now the internet world hasn´t changed much it´s still IE vs NS/FF
Nah, it's all of us against IE. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by renderhjs
Fredi
All about Netscape 4
http://dzr-web.com/demos/css/screenshots/NN4.gif
This thread depresses me.
he he found some rarities:
http://burks.bton.ac.uk/burks/pcinfo...faq/nsnot2.gif http://burks.bton.ac.uk/burks/pcinfo...aq/msienot.gif http://www.birdland.com/bfree/aolsucks.gif
some web2 logos
http://mitglied.lycos.de/mmvr2//flashkit/web2ssit.jpg
I guess from all those websites I´ve visited only flickr blog.com and wikipedia so far (from those logos)
Web 2.0 is definitely over-hyped, like any trend on the web, but most of the people in the 'know' have been talking about web 3.0 for the last few months. I'm not in the know though, so I don't know what that involves.
XMLHttpRequest is just a part of AJAX.Quote:
Originally Posted by ihoss.com
Vag, heehee
I think a bunch of things happened to converge at the same time in the internet.
1. Cheaper bandwith (allowing for better internet experiences, as viewing videos on the net, aka youtube).
2. javascript was reborn and proved not to be as hard as before (to do crossplatform stuff) thanks to gmail
3. Wifi and mobile internet boom.
4. The design community got tired of the trends dominating then, and jumped to new trends.
5. Someone thought tagging was a good form of categorizing things (I think del.icio.us started it).
6. The myspace boom.
I think those 6 things happened as different events, but started merging. The web2.0 design style is just a trend just as drop shadows, small fonts, flash intros and diagonal lines were everywhere a few years ago. Now you have big fonts, lots of empty space, 'beta' as decoration of your logo, etc
However, there's something true, there are some things that changed during the last couple of years: now you can take a photo from your phone, upload it immediately, or access the internet from almost everywhere (at least in the US) or at least from anywhere in your house. People realized that internet was not only an information tool, but also a social tool, where you could meet people (myspace) or keep in touch with your friends (blogs) or just talk to the world about how much you hate the world (youtube). And also the fact that suddenly hosting space and bandwith seemed unimportant. Do you remember the internet before gmail? before gmail, there were no 'beta' applications, no sites where you needed to be invited, no emails that offered you more than 6MB for free. Anyway, I could keep talking, but you know it all.
There's been a revolution, but as Subway mentioned, this is another .com boom. A lot of sites, companies and trends will disappear after a while, new trends will be created.
it hopefully involves a lot more pR0n. :thumbsup: :mrpimp:Quote:
Originally Posted by aversion
geez web 2.0? I must have been sleeping a long time because i dont remember when web 1.0 came out :yikes:
what a dumb thing to invent. Its not even anything, its just a new set of rules on an existing system.
So if i put a shine on my button, my website is now v2.0.
sounds alot like designers thinking they is programmers to me.
It's an advertising ploy nothing more.
So when i post from my phone, fk is web 2.0?
I was at a google lecture about web 2.0 a few weeks ago, and the speaker told up that google really has 3gb spare for every account. based on the price for one 250gb harddrive, it costs google $3 per account per month.
No.
The general definition of Web 2.0 is content that is created by the users. So all forums are. Essentially the first Web 2.0 site was the one to have a user email in and then have that put on the site and then have somebody to reply to it. So some time in 1992.
However, a lot of people will call that descripton bollocks, which Web 2.0 is really.
All these modern sites like Flickr and del.icio.us are based around sharing, so really they should just be called social sharing, not Web 2.0.
Found this on Wikipedia:
Time bar of Web 2.0 buzz words. This image shows the age of some buzzwords sometimes used in Web 2.0 lingo and its dependencies.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi.../Web20buzz.png
What that diagram is really missing is XML. Ajax, Soap, rss and mashups are based on XML. I think XML is the new technology that separates "web 2.0" from the old internet.
That is a perfect description.Quote:
[web 2.0] sounds alot like designers thinking they is programmers to me.