Facing your own heat ?

Quote:

---

The United States is suddenly faced with the uncomfortable scenario of confronting the very same weapons and military hardware, including F-16 fighter jets, it has armed Pakistan with for decades.

The unsavoury prospect of having to take a crack at the its one-time ally has surfaced most starkly in the skies over the Afghan-Pakistan border this weekend after the Pakistan Air Force deployed its US-supplied F-16s to challenge the violation of its airspace by US drones, and in one case, an airborne assault that landed US Navy Seals inside Pakistani territory.

---

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/U...ow/3482718.cms

Perhaps Pakistan should worry more about what's going on inside of their own borders rather than worry about drones flying into them.

we would **** pakistan up.

regardless... its funny to think our own tech is going to be used against us..

maybe some forward thinking next time? LOL

Quote:

---

we would **** pakistan up.

---

- With ppl like U around - No wonder Bush got elected twice !

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by silverx2

we would **** pakistan up.

---

Generally I steer clear of politics, but I couldn't resist this: that they've pretty much **** on their ownselves. Bah.

They have the bomb. I think they could **** anyone up the same.

It doesn't if you have more stones to throw if a single stone can wipe out an entire city.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hanratty21

Perhaps Pakistan should worry more about what's going on inside of their own borders rather than worry about drones flying into them.

---

Just watched a Frontline special on Pakistan's "cooperation" with the U.S. after 9/11. Considering their current political climate and the loyalties of their military leaders, it'd be a miracle if they don't fall into civil war. Which, a common enemy (say, the U.S.), helps unite people against.

That said, we don't sell military hardware to countries like Pakistan that we can't dominate. If you're not England or a NATO ally, you get stripped down aged goods. A handful of F22's would dominate Pakistan's air force before those F-16's knew they were there.

Pakistan's not stupid, they're using a little anti-American sentiment to get political support to keep from tearing themselves apart, and I don't blame them. In fact, given their nuclear capability, I'd prefer they do a little harmless sabre rattling. Knock down a couple of drones if it makes you feel good, there's no pilots to worry about. It's all for show.

I hate to be all rah-rah America, but if there's one thing left this country can do right, it's dominate the air. Now, if we could just get American auto-makers to be half as competent, we'll be on our road to recovery.

i live in a blue state and didnt vote bush either time koolbabs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by koolbabs2000

- With ppl like U around - No wonder Bush got elected twice !

---

Knowing that we have the best fighting force the world has ever seen has nothing to do with political distinctions. We would **** anyone up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jAQUAN

Knowing that we have the best fighting force the world has ever seen has nothing to do with political distinctions. We would **** anyone up.

---

We should **** up England, finish the job. Revolution II: Electric Boogaloo. ;)

I keed, I keed...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by koolbabs2000

- With ppl like U around - No wonder Bush got elected twice !

---

He said WOULD not SHOULD

Quote:

---

U.S. lawmakers on Tuesday sharply questioned a Bush administration plan to reallocate more than $250 million in military aid to Pakistan to help it pay for F-16 fighter aircraft upgrades designed to go after militants' sanctuaries near the Afghan border.

"Do we have flying al-Qaeda?," asked Rep. Gary Ackerman, chairman of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia.

---

- After knowing what Pakistan is upto - US are still giving them the technology which in turn will be used against them. Cant they learn from their previous mistakes of arming the Mujhideen which became the Taliban ?

I'm pretty sure that we waited until our air-to-air missile technology had effective ranges of 100 miles before selling them the models with effective ranges of 50 miles. Who do you think would win in that conflict of heat?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PAlexC

Revolution II: Electric Boogaloo.

---

awesome.

Its like designing hitech toothset for an hungry lion just to make sure it eats you up in return.

Here, watch this. You'll understand the political climate in Pakistan a bit better.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/taliban/

As for weapons, again, we don't sell anything that we can't destroy to non-NATO allies.

I hate to say it, because I know good people from all around...

...but the US is ****ing themselves up.

Quote:

---

As for weapons, again, we don't sell anything that we can't destroy to non-NATO allies.

---

-- So U first Sell then Destroy ! Wonderful ! The arms industry wants this - More war - More conflicts - No wonder Bush gets elected twice Coz he talks about waging war...

Peace sells - but who's buying ?

http://music.ent.tom.com/img/assets/...61025hy448.jpg

Seriously really go away. talking to you is like talking to a 4 year old trapped in a bubble that thinks its still 1983.