Printable View
http://www.analogintelligence.co.uk simple html photography / lomo portfolio site + its my first (my first css site)
a small random selection of my photography from a 4 years and all around the world. NO digital photos ALL my photos are taken on film so the colors are way more intensive color. i am a bit of a old school when it come to my photography
very beautifully layed out..
i love that you added in the no digital pictures, i only use film ... what's wrong with taking a digital shot and saturating the colour a bit in good old photoshop eh?
i'm just messing with ya.. very nicely done
i am glad you asked that
first thing first i am well into retro cameras. there are not many retro digital cameras out there
i just think there is a lot more milage with what can be done with film cameras because all the different film types you can use. for instance cross processing is some thing i use a lot, this where you use a slide film and then the film is developed in the same way a normale negative so you still get a neg but it is very nice results. the images are a lot more saturated and have high contrast.
cross processed image:
http://www.thehopeandanchor.net/fk/ibiza04-3-22.jpg
normal film:
http://www.thehopeandanchor.net/fk/ibiza04-1-8.jpg
cross processed:
http://www.thehopeandanchor.net/fk/pro-hunt2-5.jpg
normal film:
http://www.thehopeandanchor.net/fk/pro-hunt1-19.jpg
blue sky come out mega dark:
http://www.thehopeandanchor.net/fk/bgen18-22.jpg
http://www.thehopeandanchor.net/fk/bgen19-13.jpg
i no that you can change the colors in photoshop but i think you might be hard pushed to to get the same kind of effect maybe i am wrong and some will down load the normal images and repost them looking cross processed
+ i also use some thing call Agfa ultra 100 witch gives you lovely colors but not so intense as the cross processing pinks reds and blues come out lovely
http://www.thehopeandanchor.net/fk/bgen20-7.jpg
http://www.thehopeandanchor.net/fk/bgen20-27.jpg
also if have a photography on film there is no limits to what you can do with it because you can have scanned high res. i think its quite nice to see the grain of the film but pixels look crap. also a lot of digital cameras the images come a bit cold witch i don't like
+ the is nothing like the excitement of dropping off a film and piking it up 24 outs later to see what you got
an technology site is probably not the right place to start a debate about digital VS film so i getting ready to be shot down!
Very nice work. So rich, you can really see dimension in them.
I like the photos. Also the way you arranged them makes a very cool looking mosaic.
good stuff
if you like it on screen you should on seen the real thing. i made it go in a cafe and the original is 3.5 meters wide and made of 7.5"x5.5" photography's all stuck down with spray glue. i used a whole can! you can buy it if have the room!
http://www.thehopeandanchor.net/fk/onthewall.jpg
I don't know how you plan to design the flash site but with your photos you could make a killer flash site...I got some ideas if you would like to hear them...pm if you like
GREAT WORK
well the plain is to make a flash site eventually. at the moment i have loads of images in a MySQL data base and am scripting a word searchable web site. the first site will be html because i want it to be more accessible and i want google to pick up on it.
but a little while ago i did start to experiment with making a flash image browser click here: http://www.analogintelligence.co.uk/...fs/swfpage.php to see an example (i have never tested it on the web and it is just experiment that is now 2 years old). but it has down load a text file with the search words in it not very practical with 3000+ images but i ma on the case with php/MySQL
to use it type in a search word where it says "new york" (if you search new york it will open 172 images! i suggest searching "dog" or "building") and hit return or press church some thumb nails should appear. if you click once on the thumb nails a drop down menu will appear with the search terms for that image witch you can click on the fill out the search box again. if you double click on the thumb nail it will open up larger image. this is just a test the is no loading progress bars or any thing like that so it will be pretty ropey on 56k
when i get it done i plain for it to not fill that page up with images but kind of fill that page up and beyond and then for the user to start to explore the search so it would look a bit like this:
http://www.thehopeandanchor.net/fk/WPdesign01.jpg
thanks for the comments mtpgoat i will be in touch bit busy today!
good idea
that montage is unreal, i wish i could see the real thing in person. great work by the way, i am quite partial to intense color photography as well. keep it up! would love to see it as a flash site someday.
no problem DMB Lover 41 its at my house it would only cos you $538 to get here when can i expect you? :)
as soon as i get a real job i'll be there!
just a question.. can't i produce an image like this..
http://board.flashkit.com/board/
just using a digital camera?
yes you probably could but you would have to do some photoShop magic after. to get that contrast level + i like the unpredictibility of cross processing. i could show images that you would have to work hard on to get the same effect. i am bit of a snob when it come to film i just love it so much
could you please? help me out... because i really love the images in that site... and i only have a digital camera...
i really admire those images' quality.. it is so cinematographic...
thanks!
theres a book called the "digital photography manual" by philip andrews and it has a bit in there that shows you how to make your images cross processed
the shows how to loads stuff
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...glance&s=books
so you're actually saying that i can get or produce the same quality as your photos just by taking digital photos and using photoshop? whoa! that would be great!
possibly i never tryed, photoshop an't my forte
okay.. but does anyone else have another method? i'd really want to learn how to do it that way.. since film is pretty expensive.. and i am guessing that this crossed processed film is expensive to attain.. :(
posted by mxgen
cross processing film is not expensive it is just slide film witch processed in the same chemicals as negative film. (Some photo shops will not do it they say it mucks up there chemicals). The film i use is jessops own brand 100 ASA slide and all my photography chums and i think it is the best for cross processing. Other films will come out very green witch is not nice. i don't no whether you have jsessops (photographic store) in the US? but i have recently found out the jessops slide film is re-branded Germany film that apparently you can get on the net for £1.45 - $2.63 a roll. as soon as i find it i will post back hereQuote:
crossed processed film is expensive to attain
http://www.analogintelligence.co.uk/...e.php?image=99
luv that shot =]
if you have $20 buy a holgaQuote:
Originally posted by mxgen
okay.. but does anyone else have another method? i'd really want to learn how to do it that way.. since film is pretty expensive.. and i am guessing that this crossed processed film is expensive to attain.. :(
if you have $100-200 buy a lomo lca
http://www.lomography.com
or check ebay
or cosina CX2 / cosina CX1 just like lomo but has loads Accessorys like atuo winder/flash/under water houseing
much cheeper you can get them on eBay for less that $50 some times
nice