Search:

that's not really true. when opening launchpad67's site (http://www.mikekreidel.com/) in an odd sized browser window its elements display completely different than in a full size, or near full size,...

only nine voters thus far. it seems that 1024x768 is edging out the old school fav 800x600.

sagasha

dig that

sagasha

it is clean but there aint much in the way to catch my eye. as a designer i would expect some artwork front and center. that's the way to stand out from the crowd.
think about it... when i'm at...

thanks
well, that whole artist thing inside of me says, yes, the blobs stay, but the corporate part of me says... screw the poor. so, in the end the blobs will probably stay, but they will be...

ok... crappy words aside. how's the interface working?

sagasha

p.s. i have a job for a big corporation and i dont want another one. i will work somewhere where words like sh8t, p7ss, mother...

just checking the interface. its all temporary filler until the content is loaded.

and, yeah, i would buy some sh*t. if it was good sh*t.

sagasha

p.s. if someone is offended by the word...

well, i would give ya a screen shot but now the entry page is missing!!

9:42 P.M. EST

sagasha

ok... rearranged some condiments but still have to add some meat. tell me how it tastes now.

go there now

sagasha

there is nothing... just the broken link image in the upper left corner.

sagasha

i wonder if that stat can be traced. as in, has it always been this way or is the trend moving towards 1024? 800x600 has been the norm for so long it had to be the dimension of choice to begin with....

does anyone design in 800 by 600 anymore? if this protocol is dead, please post it here.

dead link... intro page leads to zilch.

sagasha

10 outta 10? c'mon, i cant even read the text!! 90% of the sites ive visited here have the whole blurry text thing still going on. STOP IT! its not that hard!

sagasha

:mrpimp: the good...
decent color combination (i love working with orange. not much call for it though, unless yer doing work for Minute Maid or FRAM)

:mrt: the bad...
there's some kinda...

i'm on IE 7 so i dunno about the registration issues.

i understand the dark interafce requirements, but again, a brighter color to compliment the darks is always welcome. just dont let it...

i must admit that i did a lot of clicking around here. but, awesome? i dunno. it just seems like there could be more here. with all the details in the artwork i was looking for something other than...

welp... i did try.

:mrpimp: the good:

:mrt: the bad:
slow load screen
dark
confusing interface that goes away when it's needed most. i don't want to have to find the links again by pressing the index button...

uhhh... no dice on the dice roller (broken link). and no, i dont wanna go to your site and register for anything.
so, that's an O-fer on the examples.

**SIGH** i was soooo looking forward to...

I still don't think you're getting it about the font. As whispers said before, it's not jiving with the overall look/feel of your site. The pixel font doesn't go well with your rounded corners and...

the spiky thing will put your eye out and the other swf is a rotoscoped bruce lee sequence repeated 24 times (not two different swfs). just roll over one to see it kill individually.

yer not the...

one giant page is very hard to navigate. try breaking down the material into sections and list them at the top so users can find them much, much easier. i believe you have done that with some of the...

please check out this interface and see what yas think. i'll be adding the content when i get ten seconds to breathe.
if you could please comment on:

the composition of the piece (layout, colors,...

:mrpimp: the good:
clean
to the point
minimal clutter
lotsa examples
quick load

:mrt: the bad:
the cut-out of your name does nothing for me. feeling 2D when all the rest of your stuff is...