Architecture site check

[kadavy.net]

Please leave comments. Some people at the firm feel that the home page is too complex, and not artsy enough. I assert that the site needs to be informational, too and it is more useful to have some information readily accessible from the homepage.

Also check out the picture loading engine within the various focus markets. It's just one piece that loads images from a FlashVars specified folder.

Post your thoughts and comments. Thanks.

www.rdgplanningdesign.info

[UrbanArtStudio]

I like it. Very clean design. THe red and white fits the purpose of the site. I would suggest an off-white color instead of just white though.

[kamyab]

I wouldn't change anything. It's great.

[sense]

Nice site. Well designed, usable interface.

"Also check out the picture loading engine within the various focus markets. It's just one piece that loads images from a FlashVars specified folder."

I bet the coding is quite nice but it somehow the design lacks the feel all other elements on the site have.

[asheep_uk]

Love it to bits. The link colours and styles are great, the fonts are great, the colours are great, the layout is great, nice graphics.

Top stuff, I can't find anything to complain about.

[Barefoot Kid]

extending the red boxes on the left hand side would help to balance the nav bar which extends to the right, some nice images in the inner pages would make them look less sparse