-
Senior Member
What in that video shows the plane go through that wall? All I saw was a jet plane crumble into nothing against that concrete wall.
"Let us declare nature to be legitimate. All plants should be declared legal, and all animals for that matter. The notion of illegal plants and animals is obnoxious and ridiculous."- T. McKenna
-
2008 Man of the Year
Quote from movie
The plane atomized with the impact...only the tips of the wings escaped total destruction
I'm not trying to say anyone is right or wrong only that do you really think the freakin center of US military operations would be devestated by a plane hitting the side of the building
SAMedia Blog (general bs) :: jwinmedia (my music site)
"Think of an advertisement where the product you're marketing is Jesus!"
-From a work for hire ad
-
Chaos
-
Senior Member
od god that was awful what did they use to animate, director?
"Let us declare nature to be legitimate. All plants should be declared legal, and all animals for that matter. The notion of illegal plants and animals is obnoxious and ridiculous."- T. McKenna
-
I think we can all agree that whatever hit the Pentagon, it was only 'one' thing ... not two or more 757s, or two or more missiles. But whatever hit the Pentagon knocked out several light poles along the way. What do you think the chances are that these light poles were lined up in an exact straight line in order for a missile to knock them all down in a single pass? And what if they weren't lined up exactly ... a missile could bounce off all these light poles and still hit the mark?? Wouldn't a missile explode on impact with the first light pole? ... or second? or ...?
Conspiracy theorists say this engine part didn't come from a 757. Do missiles have these kind of engines?
More information ON THIS PAGE
Dale
-
Chaos
ddunn did you stutter when you typed your name?
-
Originally Posted by silverx2
ddunn did you stutter when you typed your name?
My parents did when they named me
I got nothing
-
Chaos
niiiiice.
my mom hit me in the head with a toaster:-/
-
This is why I post less than once a year in the CL.
Think I'll go find thumbboy and strike up a conversation with him instead.
-
FK's Geezer Mod
Wings folding up, then following the fusilage into the building? Yeah, right. I want some of what your smoking. The wings would rip off and stay outside, and leave huge marks on the building, whether it's concrete or hardened steel or wood. And those 4 ton engines traveling at several hundred miles an hour would go right thru the walls.
I have been inside both buildings. The twin towers, while from a distence may seem not that substantial, are not your average tissue paper wall either. The pentagon building is not poured concrete several feet think, which would not be enough to stop several tons of metal flying at high speed, even if they were.
-
I Mastered Dead Technology
hey the wings folding back against the fuselage is what the aero engineers said... but what do they know.
and to hell with the crash testing that had wings folding back.
ONLY RON PAUL AND ALUMINUM FOIL CAN SAVE YOU NOW!
annoy your politician fairtax.org, a political forum
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabris, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.
-
supervillain
Originally Posted by ddunn26
This is why I post less than once a year in the CL.
Think I'll go find thumbboy and strike up a conversation with him instead.
Some members are easily forgettable or ignoreable. You just ran into one of them.
Thanks for the link.
-
Chaos
Originally Posted by TallGuyLittleCar
hey the wings folding back against the fuselage is what the aero engineers said... but what do they know.
and to hell with the crash testing that had wings folding back.
yeah, i have never ever heard of someone lieing because someone with alot of power told them to. ever.
-
I Mastered Dead Technology
Originally Posted by silverx2
yeah, i have never ever heard of someone lieing because someone with alot of power told them to. ever.
sure that could scrub the opinions of the FTA, but what about the vast majority of areo engineers and then previous crash data?
ONLY RON PAUL AND ALUMINUM FOIL CAN SAVE YOU NOW!
annoy your politician fairtax.org, a political forum
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabris, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.
-
Chaos
Originally Posted by TallGuyLittleCar
sure that could scrub the opinions of the FTA, but what about the vast majority of areo engineers and then previous crash data?
how many times has a jet liner crashed into the pentagon?
-
FK's Geezer Mod
and to hell with the crash testing that had wings folding back
Show me. I want to see them still attached enough to follow the body inside the building so there is nothing left outside.
-
I Mastered Dead Technology
Originally Posted by Ask The Geezer
Show me. I want to see them still attached enough to follow the body inside the building so there is nothing left outside.
actually they would not have remain attached. Momentum will take them in after the fuselage. I'm at work and folks will look at me strangly if i start watching jet crash video for the next half hour.
ONLY RON PAUL AND ALUMINUM FOIL CAN SAVE YOU NOW!
annoy your politician fairtax.org, a political forum
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabris, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.
-
He has risen!
i cant' believe this is even being discussed. How can any of you even theorize this and try to back it up being a missle or something else????
And silver...about the wings folding up...where do you think teh engine fuel is stored???? It's not like your Geo Prism, it's actually stored in the WINGS...so it makes sense that the wings did not 'fold up" but explode do to the impact and the combustion of the engine fuel ...
that's my last post in this thread, so you can go ahead and flame me because i'm not even going to look. This is just pathetic.
-
Chaos
i drive a focus.
and if teh wings had exploded prior to being folded up there would have been wing parts at or around the point of impact no?
i dont see any wing parts.
-
FK's Geezer Mod
Lefteye is right. Look at this pic and tell me again how these wings folded up and followed the body inside.
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/air...ff/arff757.pdf
i dont see any wing parts.
Thats the point. No wing marks on the building, no holes where 4 ton engines hit the wall, no wing marks or damage to the front of the building from 125 foot wide wings, ergo, it was not a 757.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|