DISC: 2Advanced.com - 2A Version 5 Attractor

[Adobemedia]

I would love to see a button that hides the whole interface, just showing the image underneath.

Yes. Good idea. With a little tab on the top that re-opens the interface.

[DezVette]

http://www.2advanced.com

regarding 2advanced, I dont think anyone can doubt they are easily and consistently in the top 3 hi-end flash designers.
I wish I had the "vision" these guys have on their own site.
Top Notch!!!!
Dez

[zakp0]

I would love to see a button that hides the whole interface, just showing the image underneath.

Aversion, download the wallpapers, they're your wish come true

[zakp0]

Seriously? Worked fine for me... Browser / Version?

Hope that helps

PS: Tony, pass this on if you can please, but im really disappointed about the background images not being wide enough Im on 1920x1200 and it sucks they they cut off on the sides. It would've been awesome if they covered the entire width!

[MagnusVS]

Same thing happens to me. (Using Firefox 1.0.4)

[slinky2000]

same here with undefined using FF 1.05.04

maybe you should ahve posted the site up on the site check forums, lol

[aversion]

My browser/OS is exactly the same as Zak's but it works for me. Odd.

[nizamm]

Aversion, download the wallpapers, they're your wish come true

You took the words outta my keyboard. I was sooo gonna post it before you....

[J-Luv]

My browser/OS is exactly the same as Zak's but it works for me. Odd.

i have the same version also and it works fine for me too.

[villain2]

misquote

[villain2]

That seems to show that the xml files that support the content are failing for some reason. Could be a bug with the deep linking, but more than likely the variables used to pick out the different nodes for the site were not passed properly.

It is reading the xml though, otherwise it would just be blank and not "undefined". I do know that IE 7 is crappy at reading xml through Flash ... but again, this is probably a variable/linking problem and not a browser problem.

BTW, works fine for me on FF, IE and NS

Hope that helps

PS: Tony, pass this on if you can please, but im really disappointed about the background images not being wide enough Im on 1920x1200 and it sucks they they cut off on the sides. It would've been awesome if they covered the entire width!

[aversion]

Aversion, download the wallpapers, they're your wish come true

I'm thinking more of a feature on the interface, so you don't have to go somewhere else and download something.

One of my favourite visual design sites, now defunct, was subakt.com which had a feature like this, a small area of the interface you could roll over and it hid the interface so you could see the image underneath. It was really simple and worked nicely.

[Urgemedia]

That site is pretty amazing. 2advanced studios did a good job.

[nerv_03]

Yeah I got the undefined problem on my Windows box: Windows XP Service Pack 2, on Firefox. It loads fine on my Mac on Firefox. Odd problem.

[Adobemedia]

Wierd villian 2. Tony, did 2A test this in all the diffrent browsers that were having problems.

[Trippin13]

yep the new look is there .. for sure I have no idea how they have time to do all that ... but I must say the style has not changed ... I guess it doesn't even look that fresh , apart from the imagery they created for the backdrops ... I think their main new feature is having all that havy backend stuff ... looks like their client list is growing and they needed to show it of )))

I am not sure I still like their style as much as I like their eye for detail ....

[Adobemedia]

Dude, read the case study of the site. They had 13 people working on it.

[Trippin13]

whoaaa that's maad ))

I just picked up copy of the book they were listed in Web Design Studios ... worth checking out ..there is a whole series of books published by Icon covering web design ...

[Adobemedia]

i just go to flashkit. No money involed.

[tpnovak]

Hope that helps

PS: Tony, pass this on if you can please, but im really disappointed about the background images not being wide enough Im on 1920x1200 and it sucks they they cut off on the sides. It would've been awesome if they covered the entire width!

Strange. I just tested in Firefox and had no problems here either. Same Version (1.5.0.4). Half of our team actually developed the site and tested using Firefox (as many of them prefer it to IE). From the sound of it... Its pretty intermitent as to who is having the problem, but we'll keep checking.

Sorry about the 1920x1200... We were considering this originally, but then the lower resolutions would suffer by having much less to take in. It was basically our compromise.