Originally posted by ziad10
...that's like saying "oh sony's not that good cuz they only make slick devices...why don't they make bulky multi colored devices?"
but the point there is that the futuristic style is appropriate and the design of the devices is functional. In my opinion the 2advanced site is fine, it expresses and communicates what they want it to perfectly, but i also think that most of their portfolio sites favour form over function.

Originally posted by ziad10
...that is their style, and if people want cool looking tv's or notebooks then they will like sony
yes but they wouldn't like the sonys if they were hard to operate and not advanced pieces of technology.

Originally posted by ziad10
i think its wrong to say, they are only great if they can do a lot of other styles as well.
style is one thing but it is not the same as design! A futuristic style is great if the design of the work is appropriate and fulfills the function of the site...

Originally posted by ziad10
...
what do you think of all this rambling? do you agree? or do you hate me? lol
lol! everyone is entitled to their opinion i just think you're missing the point slightly. It's not about whether the 2advanced 'style' is good or not, it's about whether the way this style is applied is good design....