But what's wrong with the article is that in Linux you are not stuck with any one desktop environment and if you want to you can dump it alltogether and run in command line. Linux is not defined exclusivly by its distro. And anyone can produce and distribute their own distros.

Plus you can write your own or customize KDE, Gnome, ECT to your exact likeing. Not to mention that KDE http://www.kde.org/ is more of a RIP of OSX than of Windows. I then ask which distros has the author tried and under which desktop environments?? From the way his article is written I would say he may have booted Lindows or Xandros but that is it.

Furthermore he misses the point on why Windows is prefered in bussiness. The reason why Windows is prefered in Bussiness is becuase there is a notion that is eronously upheld by managers that almost evryone knows Winmdows. The plain fact is that even people who think they know Windows do not know Windows. I know for a fact that only 25% of the workforce can use 75% of the windows features and pass a Windows exam. If you have a Distro that looks enough like Windows so thewre isn't much if any retraining the managers will switch in a heartbeat becuase we are talking about saving cash anmd improving the Bottom Line. In most industries IS is overhead and in almost all industries with the exception of OS makers, the OS on anymachine likewise is Overhead. In order to improve the bottom line you cut overhead among other things. Liscensing 6.0 was one of the best incentives MS could have given companys to at least look at Linux if not outright switch.

It is also assumed that Linux distro makers can not match Windows feature for feature when in fact almost all Linux Distros even Lindows, excedes Windows Feature for Feature.