I'm sorry but I saw no reason for this.

1. I did not say that something had to be "not gay" before I'd endorse it.
2. I was responding to the general accussation I've heard repeated that Trading Spaces is for women and gay men. I did not make this accussation. I was saying that I did not believe this was true. I also tried to avoid discussion on homosexuality....but apparently you people don't read "disclaimers".
3. The purpose of the thread was to discuss whether Trading Spaces was a also a guy thing....or an inspiration to designers. Period.

I'm a bit tired of thread's being hijacked by politically correct bozos....who think they have to point out if a reference to homosexuality is negative...or even implied negative.

Suggestion: Next time read what I said...and then respond to what I said. I clearly stated what I wanted to discuss...and catchy, attention-getter title aside...it wasn't on whether trading spaces was homosexual and whether there was something wrong with that.

It was soley about the show...and whether it was a good use to appreciaters of modern art.

Most of you completly missed the point....almost somewhat intentionally.

Clif