A Flash Developer Resource Site

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: [Resolved] [Resolved] [Resolved] [Resolved] Flash Player v6 Beta --- XML results

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Provo, Utah
    Posts
    1,112
    Ok. So I said I'd post these so here ya go:

    First - this is NOT the Flash 6 Authoring Environment.

    Second - this IS the Flash PLAYER v6 Beta that was released.

    So...

    Back in the day when people were still trying to manage large XML documents and Flash, I made a simple little tester to see how long it took to load certain structures of XML documents....

    With the release of the Flash 6 Beta I thought I'd open the vault and run some tests.

    HOLY COW!!!

    Uhh...

    1000 'node' XML document [not optimised] (70Kb):
    oldPlayer=26.976 seconds
    newPlayer=0.156 seconds

    Yep. A heck of a lot faster.

    Oh - and the machine running the old player is a P4 1.5GHz. The machine running the new player is a Celeron 400MHz.

    Yep. A whole lot of a heck faster.

    And...

    10,000 'node' XML document [not optimised] (693Kb):
    oldPlayer=Choke city. 1... 2... 3... ... 16... times I've had to tell the script to keep running. Ok - so by now they've found your competitors, and bought their product.
    newPlayer=0.161 seconds

    Yep. Screamingly faster. Even.. dare I say it - USABLY faster!!! Finally! Dreams come true!! Wait. Half of the FAQ's out there won't mean anything since they can quickly parse very large documents!! : ) But that's a good thing, and we're happy.

    P.s. - I know, I know - not all tests are similar. Not all XML is similar. Not all computers are similar. But guess what... Flash Player versions aren't similar either! : )

    <<< UPDATE >>>

    Wait. I was wrong. When I meant 1,000 and 10,000 I should have said:

    1,000 main nodes with 3 child nodes each - 4,000 nodes - right?

    10,000 would then mean 40,000 nodes - right?

    < voice tone = 'hushed' feeling = 'reverent' >...wow...< / voice >

  2. #2
    supervillain gerbick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    undecided.
    Posts
    18,987
    yeah, so far, everybody has noticed that the increase in XML load and parse times has been improved in orders of magnitude.

    I'm impressed.

    ]happy happy, joy joy

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    33
    that sound good - but...

    does the playing head still pause as the xml is parsed? that's been a bind for me when tryng to transparently load xml into a movie. I've been using XMLq for a while now. It's faster than the native flash player v.5 parser and doesn't stop the playing head.

    http://www.alabamasubs.com/541am/xmlq/

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Provo, Utah
    Posts
    1,112

    Uhh...

    Maybe you didn't read the numbers...

    Yep. It still pauses the playhead. But come on - 1/10th of a second?? I'd say that's do able. At 30 frames a second you'd only pause for 3 frames.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    33
    ah, yes. You're right! I didn't read the numbers properly. That's not too bad - and I don't think I'll be loading 30 meg data files too often ;)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width

HTML5 Development Center