A Flash Developer Resource Site

Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Windows inches up on Unix

  1. #1
    Griffhiggins 2.2 clifgriffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Your Bathroom! Bwahahaha!
    Posts
    1,383

  2. #2
    proud new daddy! LuxFX's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Dunsinane
    Posts
    1,148
    I don't know -- going from $4.6 mil to $12 mil for only a 50% increase? That isn't exactly good value...

    I can't wait to get a McKinley based box....
    For War's a banker, flesh his gold. There by the furnace of Troy's field, Where thrust meets thrust, he sits to hold His scale, and watch the spear-point sway; And back to waiting homes he sends Slag from the ore, a little dust To drain hot tears from hearts of friends

    - Aeschylus, Agamemnon

  3. #3
    Griffhiggins 2.2 clifgriffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Your Bathroom! Bwahahaha!
    Posts
    1,383
    The MS box is the 4.6 million one...12 million is large.

  4. #4
    proud new daddy! LuxFX's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Dunsinane
    Posts
    1,148
    Originally posted by clifgriffin
    The MS box is the 4.6 million one...12 million is large.
    right, and the article says that the MS box is nearly as powerful as the UNIX one. But I say look at the price tags, the MS box clearly has more bang for the buck.
    For War's a banker, flesh his gold. There by the furnace of Troy's field, Where thrust meets thrust, he sits to hold His scale, and watch the spear-point sway; And back to waiting homes he sends Slag from the ore, a little dust To drain hot tears from hearts of friends

    - Aeschylus, Agamemnon

  5. #5
    Senior Member SJT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    2,563
    Hmm, I wonder if all those processors make it boot up quicker once it's crashed...
    Sam



  6. #6
    Griffhiggins 2.2 clifgriffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Your Bathroom! Bwahahaha!
    Posts
    1,383
    Originally posted by LuxFX
    right, and the article says that the MS box is nearly as powerful as the UNIX one. But I say look at the price tags, the MS box clearly has more bang for the buck.
    I see what you're saying...wasn't sure before.

    SJT...lol.

  7. #7
    proud new daddy! LuxFX's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Dunsinane
    Posts
    1,148


    hey SJT, you know what would be awesome, would be if they could isolate a crash to each processor, and then use the other processors' power to get it back up to speed and the whole system never pauses....

    wishful thinking, I know...
    For War's a banker, flesh his gold. There by the furnace of Troy's field, Where thrust meets thrust, he sits to hold His scale, and watch the spear-point sway; And back to waiting homes he sends Slag from the ore, a little dust To drain hot tears from hearts of friends

    - Aeschylus, Agamemnon

  8. #8
    supervillain gerbick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    undecided.
    Posts
    18,987
    Originally posted by LuxFX
    hey SJT, you know what would be awesome, would be if they could isolate a crash to each processor, and then use the other processors' power to get it back up to speed and the whole system never pauses....

    wishful thinking, I know...
    that's called protective memory space between processes. it exists... but poorly implemented in Win2k/WinXP...

    [ Hello ] | [ gerbick ] | [ Ω ]

  9. #9
    Gross Pecululatarian Ed Mack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,954
    How about buying two Unix boxes, thats the same power for $4m less...

  10. #10
    proud new daddy! LuxFX's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Dunsinane
    Posts
    1,148
    Originally posted by Ed Mack
    How about buying two Unix boxes, thats the same power for $4m less...
    except that two of the UNIX boxes would be $24 Million...

    did you mean two of the windows boxes? That would $9.2 Million for 2x speed (where x is one of the windows boxes) as opposed to $12 Million for one UNIX box that has 1.5x speed
    For War's a banker, flesh his gold. There by the furnace of Troy's field, Where thrust meets thrust, he sits to hold His scale, and watch the spear-point sway; And back to waiting homes he sends Slag from the ore, a little dust To drain hot tears from hearts of friends

    - Aeschylus, Agamemnon

  11. #11
    Senior Member SJT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    2,563
    You get 1.5x the speed, and you also get far more reliable security...I think using windows in a high end server system is a bad idea with the near continual flow of security issues.
    Sam



  12. #12
    Griffhiggins 2.2 clifgriffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Your Bathroom! Bwahahaha!
    Posts
    1,383
    You're going to see more of it though.

    .NET is so innovative..and offers so much, companies will be moving to Windows hosts..that can support PHP, MySQL..and the coveted MS technologies.

    Could be wrong, but I think a lot of companies will see the light of .NET soon.

    Clif

  13. #13
    supervillain gerbick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    undecided.
    Posts
    18,987
    common run-time libraries/environments are not that new, griffhiggins.

    [ Hello ] | [ gerbick ] | [ Ω ]

  14. #14
    Civilian
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    In the clouds
    Posts
    3,210
    Originally posted by clifgriffin

    Could be wrong, but I think a lot of companies will see the light of .NET soon.
    From what I've heard, people will soon be seeing the light through .NET.

    don't ask

  15. #15
    Senior Member SJT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    2,563
    LOL @ starks

    In general I think *nix developers are moving away from bundling everything in some massive framework like .NET; it's too insecure.
    And infact, that's basically what *nix is about, right from the start, lots of little things that do their bit, independant of each other, which you can structure in your own way.
    Put things in securely seperate packages, and let them talk to each other; rather than one big clump of stuff which is open to anyone to mess about with by default.
    Last edited by SJT; 11-25-2002 at 11:47 PM.
    Sam



  16. #16
    Griffhiggins 2.2 clifgriffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Your Bathroom! Bwahahaha!
    Posts
    1,383
    Originally posted by gerbick
    common run-time libraries/environments are not that new, griffhiggins.
    Wouldn't you agree that ASP.net..and the whole .NET platform leave PHP, ASP, JSP in the dust?

    I mean..I've never used a tool that does so much of the nitty gritty for you..and allows you to do what you want to do..program!

    Clif

  17. #17
    supervillain gerbick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    undecided.
    Posts
    18,987
    no, I don't agree. ASP.NET is orders of magnitude slower than PHP.

    easy to use? so what.

    easy to hack. a lot of my contracts are now moving away from .NET due to security concerns. seriously.

    I think .NET Framework SP2 is extremely slow. especially when dealing with XML-DOM objects (using a non-SAX parser method) as well as database read/writes.

    [ Hello ] | [ gerbick ] | [ Ω ]

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width

HTML5 Development Center