|
-
 Originally Posted by sixones
His argument is that anything that "isn't scissors" "isn't fun"
*Removed text*
However, that is not to say I think one side is right and the other wrong. I go back and forth on the Earthquake-is-overpowered debate every day it seems... some days the top 50 is littered with EQ and other days it seems non-existent. Until the ONLY way to compete with Earthquake is to use Earth, I don't think it will be nerfed. However, I suggest (as I have before) that Earthquake should operate more along the lines of destroying 1/2 pillars in target stack, rounded down with a maximum of 4 pillars destroyed. Or 1/3 or rounded up or max 3 or max 5, but basically along the lines of never destroying ALL the pillars in a stack... It would still be a strong Earth card, but would not be so necessary in any deck using Earth element.
--rob77dp
Last edited by rob77dp; 08-08-2009 at 08:58 PM.
Reason: See following post.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|