Meh. The disappointment of having to lose my father to something that was incorrectly diagnosed and pushed aside as a "pre-existing condition" and ultimately it was found in the very last diagnosis as something totally different and that led to his death bothers the living hell out of me.

And suing won't help a damn thing either. But instead, the people will argue mother****ing tooth and nail, call people nazis for supporting such a thing and yet I wonder if they will think that when they've been somehow put in an unforeseen predicament or situation that their paid for healthcare should have provided a solution for and not sheer apathy.

The changes proposed by Obama, et al, would not have been affected my father's outcome - I'm not that stupid either. However, it pains me that people have the audacity to think that people actually want to be uncovered - when a lot have no choice to do so. It's either pay for a light bill, or pay the health bill... or pay for groceries... or pay for health coverage. I've seen that.

Had zero to do with choices. Just circumstances. And it's easy to ignore or think otherwise if you've not been in that situation for quite a while.

Anyway, argue on. I'm amazed at the argument against a change than the reasons why a change might be needed.