Quote Originally Posted by FlashLackey View Post
Yeah. I would agree with that. Though, I think that it's pretty common for people sharing a party and similar ideologies to still have varying takes on the same issue.
So without a common plan that's decided upon by the opposition, isn't that just the same (end result at least) as filibustering? Nothing brought to the table that'll actually have a chance of getting voted through could be perceived as a delay tactic and not as a discussion tactic.

How do you perceive what's being done now? Just curious.

It's the same thing on the other side of this issue. The reason Obama is having trouble has a lot to do with Democrats who object to the plan.
The lack of discussion within the Democrats, to me seems to also be a delay tactic... but nothing has really come to the table as what needs to be an option that would get passed either.

No options means that people lose out. No discussion means the anger we're starting to see. I'd love to see something different than what we're saying now.