Quote Originally Posted by FlashLackey View Post
Here's an interesting one with evidence released just last month indicating that shots may have been fired at the guardsmen first:

[insert gigantic heap of 100% pure steaming BS here]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...illings/print/

Lot's of eye-witness testimony in there for LR to sink his teeth into.
You stated the words "evidence" and "eyewitness testimony" but I could find neither.
I have searched and searched but could not find any document, source, or eyewitness testimony to support any of the claims in that story.
Did you find any source or support before posting it?

One thing leaps out from Rosen's claims that has been completely and irrefutably proven to be a lie... the idea that their were any shots fired at the guard first.
There are recordings of that day.
Those recordings were heard during the trials.
There were absolutely no sounds of gunfire before the guard started shooting.
If there had been anything that even remotely sounded like a gunshot before the guards started executing students then the first we learned of it would certainly not be 40 years later by some radical rightwing revisionist author trying to push his propaganda book praising the Nixon administration.

If the best source you can find to support your position is an unsourced and unverified blogpost by an uncredible revisionist serial-liar then maybe you should reconsider your position?