What if you knew her and found her dead on the ground?

[Loyal Rogue]

There's no need for me to find additional sources or support to post it. If you claim that he is lying, the burden is on you to demonstrate it. Considering that the article was published two days ago, it's not surprising that there isn't much else written about any new documents yet.

They wouldn't be new documents.
He says he saw them after they were declassified while he was researching for a book that has already been written, published, and sold on Amazon.
That means they have been declassified and public for a long time now.
He just decided to make the claim on the anniversary of Kent State to promote his book.

So now your bar for proof has been lowered to the point of any wild claim with no documentation or supporting evidence?

As I said, you have reached the point of zero credibility... a drowning man clutching at straws...