Please link to the source documents that prove that the eye-witness accounts you cite are not just made up. Otherwise, I'll expect you to be consistent by putting it in the unicorn and magic bruising gravel pile.
The issue was presented before multiple courts along with all of the evidence both sides felt valid in the case. Last time I checked, executions are illegal. Our courts found that the Guardsmen did nothing illegal. You have no case.
I agree. The protesters that committed violence toward the Guardsmen should be held responsible for the deaths resulting from the Guardsmen defending themselves.
If a drunk driver rams a car off the road and it hits and injures pedestrians, the drunk driver is held responsible since their illegal acts caused the damage. You're trying to argue that the driver of the car that was rammed off the road should be charged with murder.





